Some very good analysis across both magazines, using subject terminology generally well (but mastheads and cover lines relate to front covers, not DPSs) A good understanding of conventions shown. Check for spelling and typos (esp. with Billboard)
Some very good analysis across both magazines, using subject terminology generally well (but mastheads and cover lines relate to front covers, not DPSs) A good understanding of conventions shown. Check for spelling and typos (esp. with Billboard)
Some very good analysis across both magazines, using subject terminology generally well (but mastheads and cover lines relate to front covers, not DPSs) A good understanding of conventions shown. Check for spelling and typos (esp. with Billboard)
ReplyDeleteSome very good analysis across both magazines, using subject terminology generally well (but mastheads and cover lines relate to front covers, not DPSs) A good understanding of conventions shown. Check for spelling and typos (esp. with Billboard)
ReplyDelete